This latest round of censorship started in late June when Fansly announced that they were removing adult furry content from their services at the call of their payment processors MasterCard and Visa. But not content to just go after the fledgling services that are derived from OnlyFans, the processors also set their sights on larger targets including the gaming markets of Steam and Itch.io in late July.

In their statement, Fansly indicated that the card services equated adult furry content with “simulated beastiality”:

Policy Clarifications:
Anthropomorphic Content – Our payment processing partners classify some anthropomorphic content as simulated beastiality. As a general guideline, Kemonomimi (human-like characters with animal ears/tails) is permitted, but full fursonas, Kemono, and scalie content are prohibited in adult contexts.

–Fansly policy update

However, it should be noted that if (and only if) furries who are engaged in consensual adult acts can be referred to as simulated beastiality, then it would also be accurate to refer to MasterCard and Visa, who charge well over 20% in interest on money borrowed through their services to the often fiscally-illiterate general public, as “simulated slavery services”. It’s a bit harsh, and in both cases from a technically legal standpoint, inaccurate.

read more

It describes itself as search to prove this one furry is nasty. A sexual deviant. When in reality even after watching 1 episode, it’s totally set up. They are actually interviewing the one they are investigating. Also to be honest if anyone else was doing this they could be sued over personal attacks.

Which is another reason I will not mention anyone by name.

The investigation itself is a train wreck. In these days where someone could copy your online self, with a simple press on the keyboard. It is impossible to prove someone is personality without an FBI level of investigation. Which they aren’t going to get.

Then there are the detectives themselves. At least 3 of the 4 have had issues with both the law, and I am talking about police and lawyers. As well as problems with other furries in general. I am not saying who, but I know one of them are banned from a few fur cons.

Then there is that supposed numbers view count Dogpatch Press gets. I fully admit it’s rare when I get more than 100 views at one time. But according to this one site Dogpatch Press rarely sees over 700 at any one time. Not the 1000s they the opening claims.

The investigation is sloppy, strictly made for TV. Guilty or not picking the only furry I know of who gets more than 1 million views. Is strictly promoting themselves.

Besides all you need to do is check YouTube to know their so called investigation went no where.

No One was mentioned by name in the article.